Actors
Who can act, what they can optimize, and who the system fails to account for.
Protocol incentives · Governance · Token design · Agentic economies
I stress test that system. Actors, rewards, and the points where they split, especially when machines become actors.
Who can act, what they can optimize, and who the system fails to account for.
What the system makes worth doing, and what participants learn to optimize.
Where those incentives break when actors behave rationally under pressure.
A detail read of the incentive surface, including the gap between what the documentation says and what the interface makes legible.
I tested products from both the parent organisation and its DaVinci build path under ordinary infrastructure constraints.
A public framework for progressive sovereignty and the point where an economy should graduate into a tokenized system.
DRAG OR SWIPE01 — 03 / SELECTED WORK
Governance design proposal and tokenomics work, helping formalize the whitepaper so its structure matches the project’s philosophy.
Tokenomics review used to shape incentive design. Past engagement, not an ongoing retainer.
Selected work where the research moved into the protocol.
Have a protocol problem worth examining?